joe rojas-burke

science journalist @rojasburke

April 30, 2014 at 5:19pm
Home
Is the coelacanth a ‘living fossil’? 
Definitely not if you think that means these fish have not evolved since the dinosaur days. 
These sketches show the huge variety of body shapes and sizes (in meters) that evolved among the coelacanths. Some had a short, round body, some had a long, slender body, some were eel-like, others resembled trout or even piranha, Casane and Laurenti point out. You can see how Latimeria, the lone surviving coelacanth lineage, attained double the body length of its closest relative, the extinct Macropoma, and also developed a very different body shape.
Source: Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data, by Didier Casane and Patrick Laurenti, Bioessays (2013)

Is the coelacanth a ‘living fossil’?

Definitely not if you think that means these fish have not evolved since the dinosaur days.

These sketches show the huge variety of body shapes and sizes (in meters) that evolved among the coelacanths. Some had a short, round body, some had a long, slender body, some were eel-like, others resembled trout or even piranha, Casane and Laurenti point out. You can see how Latimeria, the lone surviving coelacanth lineage, attained double the body length of its closest relative, the extinct Macropomaand also developed a very different body shape.

Source: Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data, by Didier Casane and Patrick Laurenti, Bioessays (2013)

Notes

  1. saffron-muffin reblogged this from anatomicalart
  2. forgotten-by-fantasy reblogged this from brilectricity
  3. peacockmelon reblogged this from anatomicalart
  4. neganomics reblogged this from poliricks
  5. jojockey reblogged this from poliricks
  6. poliricks reblogged this from martymcflybacktothefuture
  7. brilectricity reblogged this from anatomicalart
  8. oribesocean reblogged this from gazaleah
  9. martymcflybacktothefuture reblogged this from anatomicalart
  10. charchar-is-a-charchar reblogged this from anatomicalart